As I wind down from the busy weekend I noticed SCO are up to href=http://www.newsforge.com/business/03/12/22/1733222.shtml?tid=85>old
tricks. As SCO are discovering a lot of pissed of href=http://www.groklaw.net>lawyer geeks prove to be a very useful community resource. However Linus has already done his first pass at an analysis which shows, well in his own words....
"In other words, I think we can totally _demolish_ the SCO claim that these 65 files were somehow "copied". They clearly are not.
Which should come as no surprise to people. But I think it's nice to see just _how_ clearly we can show that SCO is - yet again - totally incorrect."
Read his email if you get excited by the technical glory of it ;-)